<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autofac 2.2 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Blumhardt</title>
		<link>http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Blumhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nblumhardt.com/?p=195#comment-680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Brian,

Yes - the 3.5+ version should be what you need.

Cheers,
Nick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian,</p>
<p>Yes &#8211; the 3.5+ version should be what you need.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nblumhardt.com/?p=195#comment-658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick - thanks SO much for all you do with Autofac - it is working very well for us. I just downloaded Autofac-2.2.4.900-NET40 and noticed there doesn&#039;t seme to be a companion AutofacContrib-2.2.4.900-NET40 - there is a AutofacContrib-2.2.4.900-NET35 which says &#039;NET3.5+&#039; on the download page. Is that what I need?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick &#8211; thanks SO much for all you do with Autofac &#8211; it is working very well for us. I just downloaded Autofac-2.2.4.900-NET40 and noticed there doesn&#8217;t seme to be a companion AutofacContrib-2.2.4.900-NET40 &#8211; there is a AutofacContrib-2.2.4.900-NET35 which says &#8216;NET3.5+&#8217; on the download page. Is that what I need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Piepgrass</title>
		<link>http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>David Piepgrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nblumhardt.com/?p=195#comment-576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a DI expert, would you mind commenting on the problem of &quot;pervasive services&quot;? I have been thinking about how to reduce boilerplate in case there are several low-level services used by dozens or hundreds of higher-level services. I put an idea in my blog, http://loyc-etc.blogspot.com/2010/08/pervasive-services-and-di.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a DI expert, would you mind commenting on the problem of &#8220;pervasive services&#8221;? I have been thinking about how to reduce boilerplate in case there are several low-level services used by dozens or hundreds of higher-level services. I put an idea in my blog, <a href="http://loyc-etc.blogspot.com/2010/08/pervasive-services-and-di.html" rel="nofollow">http://loyc-etc.blogspot.com/2010/08/pervasive-services-and-di.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Piepgrass</title>
		<link>http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>David Piepgrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nblumhardt.com/?p=195#comment-574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a tutorial for the new version of Autofac? The CodeProject one (Dependency Injection in C# 3.0 with Autofac) seems to have a bunch of examples that no longer work.

I am looking for a lightweight and VERY fast DI framework, because I would like to be able to create large numbers of small objects, or resolve the same object 10000s of times in different places... Ninject 2 claims to be fast, but I found it could only create 36,000 trivial objects per second on my machine, about 3,000 times slower than an ordinary &quot;globalVariable = new TrivialObject()&quot; statement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a tutorial for the new version of Autofac? The CodeProject one (Dependency Injection in C# 3.0 with Autofac) seems to have a bunch of examples that no longer work.</p>
<p>I am looking for a lightweight and VERY fast DI framework, because I would like to be able to create large numbers of small objects, or resolve the same object 10000s of times in different places&#8230; Ninject 2 claims to be fast, but I found it could only create 36,000 trivial objects per second on my machine, about 3,000 times slower than an ordinary &#8220;globalVariable = new TrivialObject()&#8221; statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Blumhardt</title>
		<link>http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Blumhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nblumhardt.com/?p=195#comment-543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Tom! I&#039;m glad it worked out well for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tom! I&#8217;m glad it worked out well for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nblumhardt.com/?p=195#comment-535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just wanted to send a word of encouragement, since after a somewhat long and ardous test drive of a bunch of IoC frameworks we finally tried Autofac and it is brilliant. I wonder actually why would people use any other. Autofac is exceptionally simple yet powerful. I will certainly recommend it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to send a word of encouragement, since after a somewhat long and ardous test drive of a bunch of IoC frameworks we finally tried Autofac and it is brilliant. I wonder actually why would people use any other. Autofac is exceptionally simple yet powerful. I will certainly recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dew Drop &#8211; May 29, 2010 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft&#39;s Morning Dew</title>
		<link>http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Dew Drop &#8211; May 29, 2010 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft&#39;s Morning Dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 15:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nblumhardt.com/?p=195#comment-424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Autofac 2.2 Released and&#160;Simplifying ‘Configuration by Exception’ (Nicholas Blumhardt) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Autofac 2.2 Released and&#160;Simplifying ‘Configuration by Exception’ (Nicholas Blumhardt) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simplifying &#8216;Configuration by Exception&#8217; : Nicholas Blumhardt</title>
		<link>http://nblumhardt.com/2010/05/autofac-2-2-released/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Simplifying &#8216;Configuration by Exception&#8217; : Nicholas Blumhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nblumhardt.com/?p=195#comment-421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is new in version 2, and is slowly evolving towards a minimal syntax. In the latest release, version 2.2, the configuration of an excepted component can be done in-place: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is new in version 2, and is slowly evolving towards a minimal syntax. In the latest release, version 2.2, the configuration of an excepted component can be done in-place: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
